Universal Access To All Knowledge
Home Donate | Store | Blog | FAQ | Jobs | Volunteer Positions | Contact | Bios | Forums | Projects | Terms, Privacy, & Copyright
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
Upload

Reply to this post | See parent post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: Dudley Dead Date: Feb 2, 2013 12:15pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Aoxomoxoa - Original mix - Where ?

Yes !

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: light into ashes Date: Feb 2, 2013 5:26pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Aoxomoxoa - Original mix - Where ?

I think the original mix is much better... Garcia took everything trippy out of the album trying to make it more "normal"....not the way to go with Aoxomoxoa!

By the way, I believe the original mix has been released again....on vinyl, on the "Warner Brothers Studio Albums" 5-LP box set.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Dudley Dead Date: Feb 4, 2013 7:53am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Aoxomoxoa - Original mix - Where ?

After hearing it after decades (Thanks !), I can see why that Garcia, coming form where he was in 71, though it was too messy . I actually can't decide which I like better, the is something to be said for both . I think the remix does the songs better as "songs", but kitchen sink original is a lot of tripy fun , and it is my default choice . However, I don't at all like the choir in "Mts of the Moon", I think the more chaste remix is far better . On the other hand the music concrete version of "What's become of the Baby is far more interesting in the original . It is almost a different song ! Still I sort of like the stoned Gregorian chant, version on the latter mix., and I like the way Cosmic Charlie comes out of it . I think a point should be made, that coming out of a standard stereo system of the day, the original mix would have really sounded crowded, mushy ; the latter mix sound much more professional, more like the band that had done Workingman's , and American Beauty . The original sound like the band that had done Anthem ! I think we are lucky to have both.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: light into ashes Date: Feb 4, 2013 9:12pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Aoxomoxoa - Original mix - Where ?

When I compared the two mixes a while ago, I wrote:

The ’71 remix presented clearer, more organized and stripped-down mixes of the songs, with many incidental ‘studio bits’ mixed out so that the album, though less cluttered, now had less of an atmospheric ‘live in the studio’ feel. (It’s telling that the original album has no fadeouts, while most of the remixed songs fade early.) Some songs were changed more than others - Mountains of the Moon was now minus its choir and ending; China Cat Sunflower was simplified and the 40-second jam at the end discarded; Doin’ That Rag was missing the vocal outro they did live; Cosmic Charlie was quieter, with drums much reduced and TC’s organ almost inaudible; What’s Become of the Baby was stripped of almost all the bizarre electronic effects that had made the original version at all interesting, and turned into a long bore. (The feedback-drenched 4/26/69 version is probably the ideal for what this song should have sounded like.)

I agree that Garcia was trying to turn it into more of a 1971-style Dead album, making it more clean & professional-sounding. I just happen to think a lot of the charm of the album is in the more 'live,' accidental feeling of the original mix.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Dudley Dead Date: Feb 5, 2013 8:10am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Aoxomoxoa - Original mix - Where ?

I guess my ideal version would have been a slightly more "rational" version (...ugh what a word to use with the Grateful Dead), but not as extremely pruned back as the 71 mix, which is, as you pointed out, a little lacking in life . I know...a MARTIX ! ha ha ha...

Terms of Use (31 Dec 2014)